DragonS wrote:but y - need less wide for mono, cus its 1 round and not wall of them
Mono is more like a razor sharp net than a bullet, Its a thin wire that cuts through things.
For all the people confused as to why the flamer has so many +damage vs armored effects, It all has to do with a post made on the UA3 forums about how weak the flamer is vs T2s and T1s. They're there so that the flamer can be effective against hunters and such."So actually, why would you pick Flamethrower on higher difficulties is he's so uneffective ?"
Pretty much just for fun and for testing, like I said Jav Gunner is the go to for an AoE Caster MOS. The Flamethrower's Fuel discharge is more effective than the Jav Gunner's HE rocket due to its damage vs armored and how easy it is to spam it. The Jav Gunner has Para trap, AT rocket, and the ability to create explosive charges and this makes it effective vs T1s mid to late game [Something that the flamer does not have]."But I didn't even talked about energy gestion on Flamethrower"
Its not a good idea to spec for more then one skill on flamer, Basically you chose between Fuel Discharge, Plasma Shield, and Grav nade. You max that skill along with soldier skills and napalm and you have enough energy to spam it with the EN SI. So what people would do is get WK EN, put 1 point into napalm, Max Fuel Discharge, Then start maxing out solder skills and napalm. Anything weaker than Risen you kill with napalm, For everything else you spam Fuel Discharge. I would often run up to Hunters and Fuel Discharge them so they would be at very low hp [Very easy for the dps to finish them off]."I think now that I should decrease the damage of the mono wire"
I was thinking that dropping the damage by 25% for each level would be good [600,900,1200,1500]. Mono has a high energy cost, So it makes sense that its damage would be somewhat high compared to frag nade. I have noticed that sometimes with mono, Zombies that are in the targeting line don't take full damage even though there are zombies on both sides of them that do. For the reasons I stated before, I don't think that the radius should be lowered.